Why is it that just when an aircraft manufacturer finally gets an airplane “right”, they kill it dead and sweep it under the rug like it never even happened? The Douglas DC-8-73 (part of the “Super 70” series) was the pinnacle of the DC-8 series IMHO, and it’s a shame it ended there. They were really on a roll.

Anyway, huge thanks to the friend of mine who twisted my arm to create a full set of side view templates for this amazing aircraft. I’m a much bigger fan of this airplane now than I was before I did these drawings.

Douglas DC-8-73 side view templates (passenger and freighter configurations)

The drawings below are based on my DC-8-61 side view templates. Since the -73 shared the same fuselage (and many other major components) with that aircraft, all I had to do was focus on the differences.

The major differences included an extended wing, all new engines, and an extended horizontal stabilizer.

Passenger configuration

When illustrating the passenger version, I noticed that the mid-rear exit door was smaller compared to the -61. There were also two less windows (at the rear), but that might have depended on how each airline spec’d their aircraft. I’m not entirely sure if that was a universal difference of the Super 70 or not.

side view of the Douglas DC-8-73
Here’s the side view of the Douglas DC-8-73 in full passenger configuration.
side view of the Douglas DC-8-73 with bare aluminum engines
I also created a version with bare aluminum engines (since I assume that’s how most of them were delivered).
Douglas DC-8-73 line drawing / blueprint
It’s easier to see all the details in the line drawing / blueprint version.

Although the fuselage still looks too thin and weak to me, the larger engines and extended wing make a big difference. Especially when viewed from angles other than the side.

This might be an unpopular opinion, but I never really cared for the way earlier versions of the DC-8 looked. The 707 looked more substantial IMHO – which makes sense considering that it has a wider fuselage (12’-4” vs 11’-6”).

Need Larger Images?
Douglas DC-8-73 / DC-8-73(CF) Template Source Files

Fully editable 5000 x 3000 px high-resolution source files for these templates are available! Get them in JPG, PNG, PSD, and vector format.

Shop Now

Freighter configuration

The freighter version was officially referred to as the DC-8-73(CF). It was nearly identical to the passenger version, minus the windows and the addition of the cargo door at the forward section of the fuselage.

DC-8-73(CF) freighter with painted engines side view
The DC-8-73(CF) freighter with painted engines was the best looking Super 70 IMHO.
DC-8-73(CF) freighter with bare aluminum engines side view
Yeah, those giant exposed aluminum CFM56 engines were likely never that glossy in real life, but I couldn’t resist adding a little bling to these illustrations. Fear not: you can turn down the bling in the PSD version.
DC-8-73(CF) freighter line drawing
It’s easier to see the size relationship of the cargo door to the boarding door in this line drawing. Seems like such a tiny door for such a large aircraft!

Based on my research, most aircraft had one window (located in what I assume to be a functional emergency exit over the wing).

Why the design of the DC-8-73 / Super 70 series is so interesting

Probably the most interesting thing about the DC-8-70 (Super 70) series is that they were all converted aircraft. You couldn’t buy one of these things brand new from the Douglas Aircraft Company.

Every DC-8-71/72/73 (passenger and freighter configuration) started life as a DC-8-61/62/63.

a340-600 vs dc-8-73
Just for kicks, I created this illustration showing the DC-8-73 side by side with the Airbus A340-600 (the aircraft I consider to be the most similar to the Super 70). They are more different than I had originally assumed!

With its larger CFM56-2 engines and extended wing, it was transformed into one of the most beautiful airplanes ever made (my opinion anyway). Not bad for a design that was essentially hacked together with aftermarket parts.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *