As promised, I’m still making pretty good progress on finishing out my A340 collection with the addition of the larger -500 and -600 variants. I’ve got the wireframe line drawings complete, and now it’s just a matter of creating the fully shaded white versions. However, my massively short attention span couldn’t leave well enough alone, and earlier this week I felt an overwhelming urge to finish the CRJ-900 illustration that I started a long time ago (but put aside due to other higher priority projects).

I will say, however, that this urge didn’t come out of nowhere – there have been several people who have been asking me about a CR9 template for the past few weeks so that no doubt fueled the flames and I couldn’t stop thinking that I should go ahead and try to wrap this up.

CRJ-900 side view all white
A side profile illustration of an all white Bombardier CRJ-900 over a white background with and without the landing gear deployed
CRJ-900 side view line drawing
A technical side profile line drawing of a Bombardier CRJ-900 over a white background with and without the landing gear deployed

buy source file crj-900 airliner template

I thought the CRJ-700 was long, but this -900 takes it to a whole new level. All of the major components (wing, wing box, landing gear, engines, vertical stabilizer, etc) carry over directly from the -700, so this longer version seems overly stretched when comparing the two. The look of a long and sleek aircraft can be nice, but there’s a point where it can be taken too far IMHO.

And you want to know what’s really crazy? There’s an even longer version of this airplane (the CRJ-1000), which seems almost mind-boggling to me that they were able to stretch this basic airframe that much more. From a business point of view, I’m not really sure what the reasoning behind that extra stretch was – after all, the CRJ-1000 is nearly as large as a mainline aircraft at that point so it’s difficult for me to understand how the economics of such an aircraft would work.

Perhaps it’s because Bombardier wanted desperately to offer a larger (mainline) aircraft but didn’t have the resources at the time to do it? That’s the only thing that makes sense to me, but now that the CS100 and 300 have been introduced, I don’t see much life left for the CRJ-1000.

Thanks to all of you who have been patiently waiting for these illustrations. Sometimes it’s difficult for me to keep up with all the requests I get, but I’m doing my best to fulfill them all. Anyone want to sponsor me so I can do aircraft illustrations full time? 🙂

Similar Posts


  1. Hey scott.
    Just want to tell you your 737 MAX series rock. I would like it if you do the MAX 9. And I am looking forward to the A340 series. Just one thing. I would absolutely love it if you done the Concorde after the A340 series. Also please would you do the Piper Seneca V. It’s not so much work. It’s just an edited EMB-120. And about the CRJ-900, IT ROCKS! And as I am into making my own low-cost carrier and the CRJ-900 is in the startup fleet. That really helps me

    1. Thanks Parsa! Glad you liked the MAX series. I’m planning on doing the MAX 9 eventually but there isn’t much information about it yet and I don’t want to do the template before Boeing finishes the design. But as soon as it’s locked down I’ll do it! Anyway, yes, the Concorde will be a fun one to do (not sure when I’ll get to it though). Piper Seneca V? Never heard of it! Googling now….

    1. Thanks – yeah, I’ll probably end up doing a lot of these smaller aircraft once I finish with the big stuff. Eventually…

  2. These are outstanding. Your line work is impeccable! These are such a great resource for fantasy livery designers, I certainly hope people find these and credit you in their designs.

  3. Dear Scott
    I want to see if you can give me the photoshop PSD files of the CRJ900 and CRJ700. With all the layers and stuff. That will be great

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *