What a major letdown this illustration was! I fully admit that I haven’t been keeping up with all the latest developments on the Airbus A320 series of aircraft, but I had a pretty strong assumption that the A321neo LR (Long Range) was going to look significantly different than the run-of-the-mill A321neo. Maybe a larger wing with redesigned winglets? A taller vertical stabilizer? Perhaps some changes to the engine cowlings? Nope, nope, and nope.

As far as I can tell (based on all the pics of pre-production A321neo LR’s I’ve seen on the internet), there are only a few very minor visual differences over a standard non-LR version:

  • Boarding doors are reduced to three (from four on the standard A321). It’s the second one (just ahead of the wing) that has been eliminated.
  • Two small over-wing emergency exits have been added, though there is an option to eliminate one.
  • The second-most rear boarding door has been moved back slightly (by four frames).
  • A black “bandit mask” has been added to the cockpit windows, similar in design to the A350 and A330neo. From a distance, I think this looks pretty cool and fits well with the smaller proportions of the A321. However, when you look at it up close you can see that the shape of the bandit mask doesn’t match very well with the shape of the windows and it looks nothing short of awkward (and like a total afterthought). It works well on the A350 and A330neo since the windows match the outline of the mask perfectly, but I’m not so sure it’s appropriate here with the square windows. I get why Airbus is doing it (it’s a design language / corporate branding thing) but it looks totally forced in this scenario.

The problem with creating templates for aircraft that aren’t even in production yet is the fact that there are many unknowns that won’t likely be answered until they crank up the production line and start spitting these things out. Part of me thinks that a black bandit mask won’t make it to full production, because really – it just doesn’t fit the shape of the windows at all.

A321neo LR side view template
Side profile illustration of a white Airbus A321 NEO LR (Long Range) with CFM LEAP 1A engines over a blank background with and without the landing gear deployed
A321neo LR with CFM LEAP 1A engines side view blueprint
Side profile line drawing of an Airbus A321neo LR with CFM LEAP 1A engines. See how the outline of the “bandit mask” doesn’t match the shape of the cockpit windows? That really bugs me, and I wish Airbus would address that!

purchase the side profile airbus a321neo lr template source files in fully editable vector and psd format

Perhaps (just maybe?) the cockpit windows are going to be completely redesigned similar to the way that the A330neo windows were? I wouldn’t think it’s very likely at this point, with production starting very soon and it seems as if it’s a major structural change that would have been seen in testing years ago.

Another question I had while creating this template was about the engines. As deep as I dug through the Interwebs, I couldn’t confirm whether or not that the Pratt & Whitney engines are going to be an option or not. All of the pictures that I’ve seen of preproduction aircraft (and concept illustrations) seem to imply that the CFM LEAP 1A engines are the only choice, and I found no mention of Pratt & Whitney on the Airbus website – or anywhere else for that matter. I guess I’m just going to have to wait and see, and if a Pratt & Whitney powered A321neo LR ever comes into existence, I’ll be sure to illustrate a version of that one too. But for now, I’m just going to skip it.

Anyway, I can’t help but to feel somewhat unsatisfied at the moment, because I was really looking forward to digging into my existing A321neo template and making some pretty big and significant changes to create this long range version. Moving a few windows and doors doesn’t satisfy my creativity at all – especially combined with the fact that the bandit mask looks totally out of place surrounding those square windows and the designer in me wants to redesign that very (very) badly. Hey Airbus – give me a call sometime and I’ll help you figure out how to fit those A350 and A330neo-style cockpit windows onto this thing!

Speaking of challenges, I’m quite looking forward to my next template. I’m going to give the RJ85 / BAe146 a crack since it’s one of my most requested aircraft types at the moment, and I can’t wait to dive head first into that one. Please note that there will be a slight delay though, as I have some travel coming up next week and therefore I won’t be able to finish it for at least another two weeks (maybe longer) – but it is coming!

Similar Posts


    1. I wasn’t sure if the Pratt & Whitney engines were going to be an option on the LR or not. If they are, I will certainly do it!

    1. Yes! My first goal was to do most of the US/European airliners, and I’m almost finished with that. I’m definitely looking forward to doing some Russian aircraft.

    1. That would be a really long list because I’d like to hit them all. 🙂 My goal is to get all the major airliners done first (which I’m close to having complete), and then I’d like to get to some Russian aircraft after that.

    1. I agree! It’s interesting because the Comac C919 is something that several others have asked me to do as well, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen one. Good thing I know how to use Google. Haha!

  1. Hello Scott,
    I am able to download 768×473 resolution image of ‘White Illustration’ placed at the beginning of this webpage, unlike the 1024×630 resolution image of ‘Line Drawing’ at the middle of this webpage.
    So can you please provide me the 1024×630 resolution image of ‘White Illustration’ for my personal collection.
    Thanks in advance.

    1. Hi Bishal – sorry about that! I am traveling at the moment without access to my source files, but I will try and fix this problem when I return home on Sunday.

  2. Scott,
    Your work is awesome! Very appreciated.

    I want to give you the following confirmation: as of today, Turkish Airlines, Air New Zealand, Indigo Airlines and Cebu Airlines have received their first samples of A321-271NX aircraft. This -271NX series is A321LR and it does use the PW 1133G engines.
    Of all these 4 airlines, Air New Zealand is the only one that uses the “single over-wing exit”. The other 3 airlines use the “double over-wing exits”. The standard “single over-wing exit” version cancels the forward over-wing exit.
    Lufthansa and LATAM Chile are also scheduled to receive soon their first -271NX’s. We’ll see which option (single or double over-wing exits) they go for.
    Check out Air New Zealand’s A321-271NX “All Blacks” paint scheme (if you haven’t seen it already). It looks as awesome, or even more than their 777-300/-200, 787-9, A320 and Beech 1900 in the same special scheme.
    My source for the info comes from registering (for free) in planespotters.net/production-list/.They have pictures for a lot of individual aircraft.
    Also, none of these four airlines have applied the “bandit mask” to their -271NX’s, as of today.

    Keep up the excellent work.

    1. Wow, thanks so much Alec! This is really good information, and it answers a lot of the questions I’ve had about this aircraft so far. At some point I’m going to have to update this template to include both exit door configurations, the removal of the bandit mask, and the addition of the PW engines. It’s nice to see these aircraft out in the wild!

  3. Thanks for the great template! Your work always helps me. I hope to see A320P2F and A321P2F from you in the near future.

    1. You’re very welcome Yusuke! Yeah, I really need to get on those two. They’ll be added to the collection eventually!

  4. Hi Norebbo, How detailed is the Airbus A321 NEO LR (Long Range) with CFM LEAP 1A engines? can it be used for measurement purposes?, Thanks in advance.

    1. I definitely wouldn’t use this template for anything needing precise measurements / calculations. I try to make my templates as accurate as I can, but I can’t guarantee 100% accuracy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *